Welcome to the ASSAP paranormal blog! Though this blog is aimed at anyone interested in the paranormal, it will be of particular interest to the paranormal research community. Updated frequently, but not regularly (don't expect something new every day!), it covers any paranormal topic, as well as highlighting recent changes to the ASSAP website. You may not notice it but this site changes on an almost daily basis.
Whenever new information becomes available on a subject ASSAP covers, it is added to the relevant pages of the website straight away. So, just because you've read a page, don't assume it will still be exactly the same when you next look. That way the ASSAP website remains an up to date research resource.
The photo (above right, pic by Val Hope) is the ASSAP blogger himself, out looking for anomalies wherever they are to be found, so that you can read about them here. To contact the ASSAP blog, email here.
Important note: If anything in this blog does not make sense, try following the links in text! If it still doesn't make sense, that's probably my fault ...
Previous blog pages ... (including ghosts, UFOs, poltergeists, flying rods, miracles, orbs, hypnotic regression, big cats, vampires, near sleep experiences, premonitions, shadow ghosts, paranormal photos, auras, river monsters and dozens of other subjects)
ASSAP @ 30: A series of posts summarising what we have learned through thirty years of ASSAP, whose anniversary was 10 June 2011. See here!
NB: WDTHDWP = 'what does this have to do with the paranormal'
22 December: White floating thing
I stood by a busy road staring into a dark field at night. At first I could see nothing but then, there it was - a white shape floating over the field. I was about to write 'silently' but with lots of traffic just behind me, the scene was anything but quiet. There was, however, no obvious noise coming from the floating white shape that flitted over the field. A spooky white shape floating over a field just has to be a ghost, surely?
A floating white shape is certainly one popular image of a ghost. However, most reports of ghosts involve perfectly normal, solid-looking human figures firmly attached to the ground. So while my floating white shape might have looked like a typical ghost from a movie, it wasn't like the ones reported by most witnesses.
The white shape certainly wasn't mist, which has often been reported as a cause of ghost reports. The shape, which changed often, was moving around far too quickly for that. It was, in fact, a Barn Owl. In daylight it's unlikely anyone would see a Barn Owl in flight as anything other than a bird. But at night, illuminated only by street lights or the moon, it can appear ethereal and eerie.
I'm not sure where the idea of ghosts as white floating things, often transparent, comes from. It is, however,interesting that the idea persists in popular culture, despite the evidence from real ghost reports.
19 December: Strange flashing light
There was no sound just a strange flashing in my peripheral vision. I looked down to where the light was coming from but could see no obvious cause. Then I noticed a clear plastic bag on the floor that had not been there before. Experiments showed that, as it fell, it reflected light from a nearby bulb as a series of flashes. Is there no end to weird stuff caused by normal stuff?
Clear plastic bags are particularly good at producing strange effects. They blend in well with their background and so are often not noticed. But they can reflect strongly from a light source when at the correct angle. So, a clear plastic bag on the floor of a dimly lit room might be invisible until an observer moves. Then it might reflect a light source strongly, but briefly, while the witness is moving. The result is an unexplained light or flash. Even if the scene is examined closely at the time, the plastic bag may not seem to be an obvious source of an unexplained light.
When clear plastic bags are new they have very flat surfaces. But they soon acquire wrinkles after use. These wrinkles can produce multiple highlights which might together form a shape, maybe even suggesting a glowing face. Coloured plastic bags aren't so prone to producing odd light effects. They tend to be less shiny and don't blend in to their background like the clear ones.
The photo shows a printed plastic slide in front of tiles. It is strongly reflecting a nearby light source. See here for more on reflections.
15 December: Record everything!
It is a flashbulb memory of mine. I am walking along a back street, coming home from an ASSAP meeting. I particularly remember the buildings nearby, though I'm not sure how accurately. It was in the early days of ASSAP and I'd just heard details of a couple of on-going cases. Although there was still much work to be done on them, both sounded, at first sight, to be unassailably paranormal. It felt as though we were on the verge of a breakthrough - definitive evidence of the paranormal!
I expect other paranormal researchers have had similar moments. As you will no doubt have guessed, things did not pan out quite as I expected. There is a big problem with relying on case evidence to demonstrate the paranormal and it is this. Over time, once the case is finished, people will look at the case report and ask questions about it. There are two main types of questions that cause problems. Firstly, there are questions about natural explanations that the original investigators could have checked for but never considered at the time. Secondly, there are new possible natural explanations that the original investigators would not even have known to check for. An example of the second type is misperception. Until recently, misperception would only have been considered a realistic likely natural cause for particular cases, like a shop dummy or washing on a line being mistaken for a human figure. Now we know that misperception can occur with poorly-seen trees, which can appear to some people like human figures, complete with clothes, hair and particular facial expressions! So the range of objects to be considered for misperception has expanded hugely. It's unlikely anyone would have considered a tree as the likely cause of someone seeing a ghost in the early days of ASSAP.
Once a case has been investigated, it can be difficult, or impossible, to go back and check for natural causes that weren't considered, or even known about, at the time of the original report. The witnesses may no longer be around, or if they are, their memory may have changed over time. The scene of the original incidents may have been altered. Entire buildings may not even be there any more. All of this means that unanswerable questions concerning a case gradually accumulate over time, until it can no longer be considered a plausible demonstration of the paranormal. I've learned that is not a good idea to expect cases, however strong they may appear at first sight, to support the existence of the paranormal.
Is there anything that can be done about this problem? Obviously, we can use xenonormal studies to greatly improve knowledge of possible natural causes and ways to test for them. This diminishes the problem but it does not entirely eliminate it.
One possible solution is to adopt a 'record everything' approach to investigations, to try and capture every detail, whether apparently relevant or not. In other words, we would record more information than just the obvious minimum that might appear necessary to eliminate natural causes. Then this information could be stored digitally and reanalyzed later as questions about the case arose. I can think of some classic cases that I'd love to reanalyze if only such additional information was available. I'm sure some of my questions about these cases could be answered easily if only this information was available.
12 December: Lumpy horizon
I love examining strange photos! I like taking strange photos even more. However, I never thought the photo (right) odd in any way when I took it. This photo (right), like the one in 8 Dec post, is also from the seaside.
Perhaps surprisingly, the picture shows the horizon, with a calm sea below and yellow sky above. So what are those odd-looking 'lumps' on the horizon? Some appear to be floating above the sea with a visible gap beneath. This picture is tightly cropped, from a much larger photo, to show the oddities on the horizon. These ragged lumps continue right across the horizon in the original photo, and occur in other shots taken at the same time. I've compared the horizon with other photos taken around the same location on other occasions. In those other photos the horizon looks flat, just as you might expect.
So what are these odd lumps? One possibility is large waves. However, they don't look like waves and the sea was calm. So what about clouds? There ARE some clouds in this, and other, photos taken at the same time. They are all yellow or white, no dark ones at all. Indeed, the yellow above the horizon in this photo IS cloud. All the lumps occur are ONLY on the horizon, unlike other clouds present. What about boats? The gaps under some of the lumps would appear to rule boats out.
I think the big clue is that the lumps are the same colour as the sea below. In other words, the ARE the sea! I think the lumps are a mirage of the sea itself. The second photo is of exactly the same place (you might be able to make out a distant gull, top right, in both images). The second photo (right) was taken just 0.15s after the first. The lumps have altered noticeably in that short period. This rapid variability, on its own, effectively rules out boats, clouds and waves. But it does fit with mirages which can change rapidly due to turbulence in the air.
Such horizon mirages can sometimes produce spectacular images of objects beyond the horizon, like boats or islands, that appear to float entirely in the air. They can give rise to reports of UFOs or ghost ships. For more mirages, see here.
8 December: Strange light
I love examining strange photos! I like taking strange photos even more. However, I never thought the photo (right) odd in any way when I took it. So, I was a bit surprised when, viewing it later, I found a mysterious ball of light in it.
It isn't an orb, being too bright and its edges not well-defined. Nor does it appear to be lens flare, because there was no bright light source just outside the frame. Nor does it look like typical lens flare. So, is it really a floating ball of light? Here are the clues to what is going on.
It would help, of course, to know what the photo is actually of. It is an eroded bed of chalk on a beach. There are several flat, white areas on the knobbly surface. These are pools of water, left by by the retreating tide. The shadows on the knobbly bits of chalk are all facing the camera. That means the sun was directly ahead.
Now it becomes obvious that the 'ball of light' is actually a reflection of the sun in a small pool of water. It is over-exposed, which is why there is no detail in the 'ball of light'. The photo was actually deliberately overexposed (by 2 stops) for effect but I never realised there was a reflection of the sun in shot. It was unintentional and ruined the intended effect. It will make do as an illustration of what a mysterious floating ball of light might look like, however.
4 December: Explaining orbs
Many paranormal researchers now accept that orbs are not paranormal. But this doesn't stop orbs being reported by members of the public all the time. To them, orbs are new and mysterious. Though we have a lot about orbs on this website, I felt there was a need for a new page that provided an introduction to the subject. It is aimed at people who have just seen their first orb and are curious about what's going on. In the past, when asked about orbs I've had to give links to several different pages, none of which is aimed at total beginners. Now, I can use just one link - here.
I've added a brand new photo illustrating the orb zone using screws (!). I've thought about producing such a photo for a long time but, as with so many things in life, never quite got round to it until it became urgent. The photo shows how orbs vary in brightness and size according to their position within the zone.
The photo (above right) shows some diamond-shaped orbs. Such non-circular orbs are one of the important indicators that orbs are a phenomenon caused by the camera itself rather than the object being photographed, such as a dust particle. That's because all orbs photographed by a particular camera are always the same shape. If orbs were a phenomenon external to the camera, this should not happen.
1 December: No UFO but green blob instead
I took the photo because it looked like a UFO. There was a bright light apparently floating low in the twilight sky. The photo (right) turned out to be a disappointment as far as UFOs were concerned. My supposed UFO is the small bright light on the left. In the photo you can clearly see it is a mounted artificial light on a post. The whole scene looked much darker to the naked eye and the post was invisible. The brighter light to the right is also mounted on a post, even though it isn't obvious from the photo.
When I examined the photo itself I noticed something I hadn't seen at the time - a bright green glowing blob in the bottom left. It's clearly an anomaly but what is it? The vital clue is the presence of the two bright light sources in the frame. The blob is lens flare. I don't know of any bright green glowing ghosts, outside fiction, but if they exist they might look like this. If anyone knows of any reports of green glowing ghosts I'd be very interested to hear from them.
Interestingly, the lens flare would definitely have been visible in the camera viewfinder when I took the shot but I don't recall seeing it at the time. I guess I was concentrating hard on the UFO. People often report seeing objects in photos that were not noticed at the time of exposure. I think this demonstrates that when you're concentrating on your subject, you can even miss bright green glowing blobs!
PS: In November we recorded 557228 hits on the website, making it one of only 4 months ever with over half a million. In fact, it was the second highest ever total, only exceeded by the previous month.
|For a review of paranormal research in the noughties, see here.
Last month's (November) website figures are an average of 18574 hits per day. This is a little down on the previous month's 19164 daily average.
Previous blog pages ...
- Nov 2014 (including doors opening by themselves, haunting flashes, sense of presence, formant noise)
- Oct 2014 (including animal ghosts, tricorn-hatted figure, seeing 0.23 celebrities monthly, dancing ghost)
- Sep 2014 (including paper defying gravity, low flying UFOs, photographing ghosts, movonmg still photos)
- Aug 2014 (including figure on a pillar, orbs still worth studying, ghost objects, shadow ghost)
- July 2014 (including yellow orb, teleportation, ghostly whispers, owl, strange announcement)
- June 2014 (including hand in a tree, blurry flying object, white alien, strange pattern on a dragonfly)
- May 2014 (including single witness UFOs, ghosts vanishing, anomalies seen through gaps, rock face, creeping doppelgangers)
- Apr 2014 (including unrecognized ghosts, odd UFO photo, do short-sighted people see ghosts, man with no face)
- Mar 2014 (including unusual shaped UFO, ghost on a train, ghost presence, vampires, ghost calling)
- Feb 2014 (including confusion, daylight orbs, haunted milk bottle, ghost on a bridge, too obvious explantations)
- Jan 2014 (including colliding orbs, ball lightning, de-orbing, ghost mouse, mysterious flashes, ghost misidentification)
- Dec 2013 (including popping orbs, new shadow ghost, ignoring a ghostly hand, dust turning into orbs videoed)
- Nov 2013 (including hearing voices, blurry ghosts, mirrors and ghosts, coincidences, UFOs near airports)
- Oct 2013 (including fairy photo, mist ghost, yeti, premonitions, orbs are NOT dust, how hauntings start)
- Sep 2013 (including moving sticks, targets affecting odds in psi tests, shape shifting, not photographing ghosts)
- Aug 2013 (including ghosts in plain view, mystery photo, seeing faces, ear pointing, shadow presence, time distortion)
- July 2013 (including floating ghosts, on being a ghost, ghost ducks, follow that ghost - yes, ghosts galore)
- June 2013 (including transparent ghosts, distance of UFOs, other stuff going on while witnessing anomalous phenomena)
- May 2013 (including ghost seen AND photographed, time distortion, reproducing anomalous phenomena)
- Apr 2013 (including door ghost moving, UFOs from a train, missing time, reality glitches, EVP without E, weird photos)
- Mar 2013 (including witness credibility, distraction to see ghosts, movie in real life, photo or witness)
- Feb 2013 (including possible orb comeback, OBEs go mainstream, walking ghost, feelings without touch, object movement)
- Jan 2013 (including a big problem with ghost vigils, time distortions, cryptids, snow ghosts and rods, causes of hauntings)
- Dec 2012 (including mysterious injuries, ghosts versus people, voice from nowhere, experimenting with a ghost)
- Nov 2012 (including reflected ghost, isolated EVPs, ghosts talking to each other, invisible presences)
- Oct 2012 (including ghostly presence, shadow ghost, strange pigeons, window ghosts, hallucinations)
- Sep 2012 (including yellow grass, weird waterfalls, vanishing buzzard, ghost vigils, slowing down time)
- Aug 2012 (including seeing unknown animals, glowing lampposts, EMF meters as an accident of history)
- July 2012 (including turning rods into orbs, psychic insight, making insects spell, glowing eyes, haunting hot spots)
- June 2012 (including doppelganger mystery, not expecting ghosts, anecdotal evidence, credible witnesses)
- May 2012 (including lenticular cloud, ghost encounter, ghost train, weird stuff in a tree, van Gogh, resolution)
- Apr 2012 (including naturalists and ghosts, odd feelings during OBE, wrong kind of sound, voice from nowhere)
- Mar 2012 (including jogging and ghosts, misty ghosts, image noise, full spectrum photography, EVP of machines)
- Feb 2012 (including ghost car, analyzing anomalous photos, ghost at rock concert, OBEs and motion sickness)
- Jan 2012 (including stopping flying rods, photographing fairies, time warp, a ghost tie, ghostly fingers, New Year UFOs)
- Dec 2011 (including missing time, improving ghost vigils, anomalous photos, ghostly faces, seeing fiction)
- Nov 2011 (including OBE video games, EVP and VLF, whatshisname, paranormal misconceptions, invisible ghosts)
- Oct 2011 (including smartphone ghosts, similacrum, smell of ghosts, morphing UFOs, slowing time)
- Sep 2011 (including tidy ghost, MADS, transparent ghost, big announcement, ghost fox, not alone)
- Aug 2011 (including cold spots, spectral hound, triangular UFO, ghost photos, rushing air and being dragged)
- July 2011 (including Hilary Evans, Harry Potter, witness investment, bias in paranormal research, TV detectives)
- June 2011 (including ASSAP @ 30, detecting lies, hyper-vigilence, strange thunder)
- May 2011 (including ASSAP @ 30, lone shoes, flying rods, bias, early memories, strange floating object)
- Apr 2011 (including royal wedding, mirror touch synaesthesia, sleep disorders, new ghost sighting)
- Mar 2011 (including roof heron, Atlantis, first time witnesses, comparing film to digital paranormal photos)
- Feb 2011 (including predicting the future, ghost bird, time slip, weird floor, what do we really know about paranormal)
- Jan 2011 (including the ghost hunting boom, orange UFO, EVP experiment, extreme normality)
- Dec 2010 (including microsleeps and road ghosts, shadow ghost in snow, lack of ghosts in photos, anthropomorphism)
- Nov 2010 (including EMF meters, auras, evidence for precognition, sensitisation, the ghost hunting boom)
- Oct 2010 (including black orbs, UnConvention, mirror visions, levitation, flying rods and orbs)
- Sep 2010 (including a ring tone from the roof, shadow ghost video, time slip explanation, daylight orb video)
- Aug 2010 (including Parisian UFO, sense of presence, SLI, consulting experts, misperception)
- Jul 2010 (including Sherlock Holmes as a paranormal investigator, haunting sounds, what ARE hallucinations)
- Jun 2010 (including the Loch Ness Monster, gorilla video, getting ghost stories the wrong way round)
- May 2010 (including ball lightning, Wem ghost photo, waking up twice, eyewitnesses, Robin Hood)
- Apr 2010 (including causes of road ghosts, new orb evidence, bird UFOs, UFO photo, not quite seeing is believing)
- Mar 2010 (including experiencing hypnagogia, consciousness, belief, prolonged misperception, doppelganger)
- Feb 2010 (including visual continuity errors - AKA ghosts, near sleep experiences on trains, spontaneous OOBEs)
- Jan 2010 (including intelligent oil, SLI, inducing OOBEs, orange UFOs, the bleak midwinter)
- Dec 2009 (including review of research in the noughties, pretty orbs, imperceptions, river monster)
- Nov 2009 (including EVP without a recorder, demons and entities, why only some people see ghosts)
- Oct 2009 (including grey ghost, near sleep experiences, a triangular UFO and seeing David Beckham)
- Sep 2009 (including latent memory, Tufted Puffin, Bermuda Triangle and garden poltergeist)
- Aug 2009 (including official UFO files, partial ghosts, flying rods and miracles)
- Jul 2009 (including garden poltergeist, big cat video, orbs and hypnotic regression)
- Jun 2009 (including thoughts from nowhere, shadow ghosts, premonitions and metallic UFO)
- May 2009 (including analysing paranormal photos, making ghosts and ghost lore)
- Apr 2009 (including phantom bird, choice blindness and grass that gets up and walks away)
- Mar 2009 (including deja vu, ghostly mists, weird UFO photo, white ghosts)
- Feb 2009 (including hidden memories, coincidences, auras and window UFOs)
- Jan 2009 (including animals sensing ghosts, vampires, flying rod season and a haunted path)
- Dec 2008
- Nov 2008
- Oct 2008
- Sep 2008
- Aug 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- Even older
© Maurice Townsend 2014